Hulskof schreef op 22 november 2020 00:26:
CEO over Merck/Peloton: "Mrck data is good and it further validates the hif2a target.
We don’t have to be better than that drug to have a drug….physicians like options. I think if we can provide options then I think we have another drug on our hands. Ours is a targeted drug. The mrck peloton drug is a small molecule that goes everywhere. This rnai drug is designed to go tumors and so we may get less anemia…I don’t know if we’re dependent upon that but I believe it is a possibility. I’m hopeful we get good knockdown, and like enac data, if we get good data here, there are two things we can read on that:
A). I think it suggests we have a drug
B). We have a platform
Our targeting strategy is designed to work for a variety of solid tumors, we may have a platform that can apply to various solid tumors, various gene targets and we think that is a very large opportunity we will have data we can share in the first half of next year."
Bereidt hij ons hier voor op minder effectieve data dan Merck te bieden heeft? Of wordt het zoals altijd: underpromise and overdeliver?
Groot vraagteken.