cave canem schreef op 7 september 2017 19:19:
dit is de laatste update die ik voorbij zie komen is van eind augustus
"delivering on automotive "
TT versus HERE
TT's map platform is better than that of HERE
TT uses a combination of traditional map-making ( cars with camera's on top driving around) and community input.
the latter input sets it apart from the competition, as TT's community input is unprecedented, with 400m sources of probe data that feed into its database.
the quality of the probe data has already resulted in a best-in-class traffic service, but now it also results in cost-efficient high-quality map-making
an up-to-date map is crucial for highly automated and self-driving cars
the map is a strategic asset for increasing levels of automation in driving
the combination of sensors, software and real-time map and traffic content is used simultaneously to drive safely thru traffic.
there will be several competing and complementary technologies in this field, but either way we see TT's map as key enabler
TT's current mkt cap is 2 bln euro ( whole Group, we give no value to consumer )
we believe this is very modest for their main asset Maps, that only has one automotive alternative , HERE.
the price paid for HERE by a consortium of car manufacturers was euro 2.8 bln and recently revalued upwards to 3.4 bln ( basis new participations)
we hoeven dus niet te denken dat men niet weet hoe TT's bezittingen te waarderen, we moeten enkel even iemand vinden die de waarde naar boven haalt en aangezien het Bestuur bij TT niet bij machte of niet bereid is dat te doen blijft de vraag " waarom ? "
nou, dat merken we volgend jaar wel als het van de beurs gaat , want die mogelijkheid bestaat en net zoals Kim solliciteert om een muilpeer van Trump, zo vraagt TT om gekaapt te worden, vooral als men er intern aan meewerkt.